User talk:Tsaitgaist

Drawings in GPS article

Tsaitgaist, I agree that this new drawing, File:Lat 2spheres 2.svg, does have the polar vertical and is compatible with the accompanying text. The color that you have added serves to clearly distinguish the two spheres and may be a little more pleasing for the readers of Wikipedia. RHB100 (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, I still disagree with you regarding, File:Gps error diagram.svg. This drawing looks more like a flow chart than a geometric figure and gives the false impression that the errors are all in the same direction and thus additive in my opinion. RHB100 (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you go ahead and add the figure, File:Lat 2spheres 2.svg, since we both agree that this is a good figure, the color serves to distinguish the 2 spheres and the readers may appreciate a little color in the figures. After that we can discuss the figure on which we disagree. RHB100 (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is anything wrong with File:Gps error diagram.jpg. I think it shluld bel left as it is. Can you find anything wrong with it and if so what? RHB100 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created the diagram to make the effect of errors more understandable. I can increase from the thumbnail to full size with no noticeable loss of quality. I am not sure you fully understand the reason why it is drawn as it is. Therefore if you want to draw it as a .svg file, it is necessary that you draw just as it is. RHB100 (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have made valuable contributions to the GPS article with the figures you have already added. However, I ask that you leave the error diagram. File:Gps error diagram.jpg, as it is. I think the time spent for you to continue asking questions and for me to try to answer then is not worth it. I am sure that you have the talents to make improvements in many other areas. In summary you have made valuable contributions with improvement of GPS figures. But let's just leave the error diagram as it is. RHB100 (talk) 20:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]